# Quality Scoring ## Stakeholder-specific Scoring The **Quality Score** is based on the quality of contributions from the specific user. Depending on the role of the user, this has a slightly different meaning. ### Contributors For contributors the Quality Score is based on the feedback of Reviewers and Clients. ### Reviewers For Reviewers the Quality Score is based on the reviewer consensus and the feedback of Clients. * If the reviewer consensus agrees with the individual reviewer this results in a positive quality score and vice versa * If the client feedback corresponds with the reviewer feedback this results in a positive quality score and vice versa ### Clients The Client Quality Score is based on the comparison between client feedback and reviewer consensus. * If the client feedback corresponds to the reviewer consensus, this results in a positive quality score and vice versa. ## Calculating the Quality Score The Quality Score is calculated using an Exponential Moving Average, similar to the Quantity Score. The EMA is based on the values Fi Î {0,1} which indicate negative and positive quality scores for the scenario’s described above. --- # Agent Instructions: Querying This Documentation If you need additional information that is not directly available in this page, you can query the documentation dynamically by asking a question. Perform an HTTP GET request on the current page URL with the `ask` query parameter: ``` GET https://hugs-solutions.gitbook.io/hugs-platform/the-hugs-layer/on-chain-reputation/quality-scoring.md?ask= ``` The question should be specific, self-contained, and written in natural language. The response will contain a direct answer to the question and relevant excerpts and sources from the documentation. Use this mechanism when the answer is not explicitly present in the current page, you need clarification or additional context, or you want to retrieve related documentation sections.